User talk:Jarekt

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Tech News: 2024-20

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:55, 13 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-21

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 23:01, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-22

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 00:12, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Minpromtorg.gov.ru/en has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Tube of Light (talk) 15:18, 1 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-23

[edit]

MediaWiki message delivery 22:32, 3 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting

[edit]

Hello! I'm just wondering why'd you revert my adding of the PD-State of Palestine on official governmental items? RowanJ LP (talk) 15:56, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

RowanJ LP, Per Commons:Village_pump/Copyright#Template:PD-State_of_Palestine discussion I removed information about flag trademarks from {{PD-State of Palestine}} as trademarks are not related to copyrights. Without the part about the flags, {{PD-State of Palestine}} is equivalent to {{PD-anon-70}} and apply to anonymous works or need to apply to "statute, regulation, Knesset protocol or court decisions". Most of the files I reverted were flags and emblems created by Commons users, so none of the conditions of the template apply to them. Also in the current state, I do not think {{PD-State of Palestine}} is valid, see the discussion, so it will likely need to be changed or deleted. In case it is deleted, I don't want those files (with seemingly valid licenses) to get mixed up in the discussion. --Jarekt (talk) 19:43, 4 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I didn't know that this discussion was currently going on, thank you for bringing this up. RowanJ LP (talk) 12:34, 5 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]